THE ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW UZBEKISTAN: CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS, HUMAN DIGNITY AND THE SOCIAL STATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47390/hum-i7v2y2026/n01Ключевые слова:
Constitutional reform, New Uzbekistan, human dignity, social state, comparative constitutional law, rule of law, fundamental rights, institutional accountability, constitutional court, social rights enforcement.Аннотация
This article examines the constitutional reforms enacted in the Republic of Uzbekistan through the amended Constitution that entered into force on 1 May 2023, situating them within the processes of state-building, human rights protection, and the development of a constitutionally grounded social state. Using doctrinal, comparative, and socio-legal methods, the study analyses the constitutional entrenchment of human dignity, the expansion of social rights, and the strengthening of institutional accountability mechanisms. Comparative insights are drawn from Germany, France, Japan, and South Korea, while empirical indicators from the World Justice Project, UNDP, Transparency International, and Freedom House provide contextual support. The findings demonstrate that the 2023 reforms have established a stronger normative foundation for the protection of fundamental rights, social justice, and the rule of law. The article proposes legislative and institutional reforms, including enhancement of constitutional justice, establishment of an independent social rights monitoring mechanism, and introduction of a constitutional dignity standard in administrative decision-making.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, adopted by referendum of 30 April 2023, entered into force on 1 May 2023 (No. 03/23/837/0241). Lex.uz.
2. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on the Constitutional Court, 25 November 1995, No. 129-I (as amended through 2023). Lex.uz.
3. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative Procedures, 8 January 2018, No. O‘RQ-457 (as amended). Lex.uz.
4. Alexy, R. (2002). A Theory of Constitutional Rights (J. Rivers, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
5. Kommers, D. P., & Miller, R. A. (2012). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (3rd ed.). Duke University Press.
6. Fredman, S. (2008). Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford University Press.
7. Tushnet, M. (2008). Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton University Press.
8. Rios-Figueroa, J., & Staton, J. K. (2014). An evaluation of cross-national measures of judicial independence. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 30(1), 104–137.
9. Freedom House. (2023). Nations in Transit 2023: Defying the Pull of Autocracy. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2023
10. Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023
11. UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023/24: Breaking the Gridlock. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24
12. World Justice Project. (2023). Rule of Law Index 2023. Available at: https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/
13. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1990). General Comment No. 3: The Nature of States Parties’ Obligations (UN Doc. E/1991/23).
14. UN Committee Against Torture. (2019). Concluding Observations on the Fifth Periodic Report of Uzbekistan (UN Doc. CAT/C/UZB/CO/5).
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.